PLAY'S · META · 4 OCT 2026
Day nine: the tally and the tier list name the same two decks
For six days running, the most-encountered named deck in the New Division format was less common than the most-encountered deck the day before — 26.8% on 24 September down to 13.3% on the 29th, just under half. That stopped. On 1 October the figure was 22.0%, the second-highest reading of the nine days. And on 1 and 2 October the two decks people ran into most were the two decks the published ranking puts in its top tier, which before this week had happened on one day only, 29 September.
The six-day page covering 24–29 September is left as it was. This is a separate page, not a rewrite of it.
The leader column now says named deck. The survey's own unnamed bucket was larger than the leading deck on 27 and 28 September, so that column is the leading deck, not the largest slice. All four were caught by recomputing the claims from the table rather than re-reading the sentences.
Three other things in that reading. The survey was back up to 325 games from 124, so it is the firmest single day since 27 September. The leader's share was 21.5%: every reading since the 13.3% low on 29 September has been above it, though not rising every day — it fell on 2 October. And the Magic Tools entry read 4.6%, the lowest single Magic Tools reading of the format, with no second Magic Tools entry beside it this time. That is not a clean comparison with the day before, when there were two entries adding to 12.1; part of the missing 3.2 may now be sitting in the unnamed bucket rather than having gone anywhere. Cotton Zenith was 9.5%, its highest since 29 September.
The bucket count moved the other way this time. The survey itemised 10 named decks on 3 October against 13 on 2 October, and the three that went — one of them the second Magic Tools entry — were worth 9.6 points between them. "Other" rose by 11.5, from 4.3% to 15.8%. So 9.6 of that 11.5 is the bucket count, and 1.9 is not. The same caution applies as on 2 October, in the opposite direction.
The table on this page still covers nine days and has not been changed.
Read the Baraghiara line carefully. The survey split it: a new entry, Cabbage Baraghiara, appears at 4.2% beside the loop's 11.2%. Taken as one family that is 15.4% against 17.5% the day before — down 2.1, not down 6.3, which is what the loop line on its own says. One bucket was added and none was removed, 10 to 11.
Otherwise, from 312 games: Cotton Zenith reached 11.2%, its highest since 28 September, on a third straight rise — and it is still in no tier at all. Jokers fell for a second day, 17.7 to 15.4 to 13.5 — its longest run of falls since the format opened, and still only two. The leader's share was 17.3%.
Nine days, one row each
| Date | Games | Most-encountered deck | Its share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Sep | 82 | Magic Tools | 26.8% |
| 25 Sep | 308 | Magic Tools | 20.5% |
| 26 Sep | 333 | Magic Tools | 19.5% |
| 27 Sep | 386 | Raid | 15.8% |
| 28 Sep | 216 | Cotton Zenith | 13.9% |
| 29 Sep | 294 | Jokers | 13.3% |
| 30 Sep | 132 | Raid | 15.2% |
| 1 Oct | 164 | Raid | 22.0% |
| 2 Oct | 124 | Jokers | 17.7% |
Share of games the single most-encountered named deck accounted for, by day. The survey's unnamed "Other" bucket is excluded from this column because it is not a deck; on 27 and 28 September it was larger than the leading deck.
The slide stopped on day seven
The first week's story was that nothing held. Every day the leader was a little less dominant than the leader before: 26.8, 20.5, 19.5, 15.8, 13.9, 13.3. Six falls in a row, and by the sixth the top deck was barely more than a tenth of the field.
Then 15.2, 22.0, 17.7. The thing that had fallen every day for six days did not keep falling. The 1 October reading is higher than every day of the format except its first.
Raid held the lead two days, and grew while holding it
Between 27 and 29 September the lead changed hands every single day — Raid, then Cotton Zenith, then Jokers. Raid took it back on 30 September and kept it on 1 October, and it did not just hold: it went from 15.2% to 22.0%, about half again as common. That is the first repeat since the opening stretch, when Magic Tools led for three days running — and the first time any deck has held the lead on consecutive days since 26 September.
On 2 October it lost the lead again, to Jokers at 17.7% against its own 16.9%. Jokers has now gone from 4.9% on day one to 17.7% on day nine, more than three times its opening figure. It fell twice on the way, on 25 September and again on 30 September.
Every deck this site has been following, every day
| Date | Jokers | Cotton Zenith | Raid | Magic Tools | Loop | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Sep | 4.9 | 4.9 | 24.4 | 26.8 | 3.7 | 8.5 |
| 25 Sep | 4.2 | 5.5 | 16.6 | 20.5 | 9.7 | 12.7 |
| 26 Sep | 5.4 | 7.2 | 16.5 | 19.5 | 15.0 | 15.1 |
| 27 Sep | 7.5 | 9.3 | 15.8 | 13.7 | 10.4 | 16.4 |
| 28 Sep | 11.1 | 13.9 | 11.6 | 13.4 | 8.3 | 15.8 |
| 29 Sep | 13.3 | 9.9 | 12.6 | 9.2 | 9.5 | 13.2 |
| 30 Sep | 9.8 | 5.3 | 15.2 | 7.6 | 13.6 | 12.3 |
| 1 Oct | 14.6 | 4.9 | 22.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 17.7 |
| 2 Oct | 17.7 | 5.6 | 16.9 | 8.9 | 15.3 | 4.3 |
Percentages of games surveyed. "Loop" is the Baraghiara loop deck; "Other" is the survey's own unnamed bucket. Read the Magic Tools column with the caveat below.
The two lists now point the same way
On 2 October the two most-encountered named decks were Jokers and Raid. The ranking, as updated on 3 October, puts exactly two decks in its top tier: 自然ジョーカーズ and 火光レイド. Same two decks.
That pairing has now held on three of the last four days — 29 September, 1 October and 2 October. The exception is 30 September, when the deck second behind Raid was the Baraghiara loop.
The two sources also use different names for the same decks — 火光レイド against 赤白レイド, 水魔導具 against 青魔導具. That is a reason to read them as two sources, not one dataset.
Cotton Zenith is still in no tier at all
Cotton Zenith was the most-encountered named deck in the format on 28 September, at 13.9%. It is 5.6% on 2 October, still ahead of most of the field. The ranking does not contain it — not in the top tier, not in the one below, not anywhere on the page. That was true when the ranking first covered this format and it is still true after the 3 October update.
This page is not in a position to say which reading is right. It can say that one source counted it as the single most-played deck in the format and the other has never listed it.
Three things in this data changed shape, not size
What else was running at the same time
The Legend Battle opened at 17:00 on 1 October and runs to 21 October; October's sanctioned tournaments run all month. The 1 October row therefore covers the same day a large solo event opened. Whether that moved players out of ranked queues, and which decks they were playing, is not something an encounter tally can answer.
Two competitive events were announced on 1 October — 「ミノガミ杯」 from 8 October and BATTLE ARENA 2026 AUTUMN from 26 October. Both are All Division. Everything on this page is New Division, so none of it describes the field those will be played in. The dates are on the calendar.
This is a count, not a verdict
Encounter rate is not win rate. A deck can be everywhere and lose; a deck can be rare and win. The survey is compiled by one person, from their own games, with every rank band mixed together. It is the best daily record of this format in public, and it is still one person's sample.
Sources
Daily encounter counts, 24 September to 2 October: the New Division survey reports published at BEANS, read on 3 and 4 October 2026. The figures are read off the chart image in each day's post; the posts carry no table. Sample sizes and the compiler's handle are printed on each chart.
Top tier, and the absence of Cotton Zenith: the New Division deck ranking at Kamigame, as updated 3 October 2026, 12:30 JST. Only the contents of its top tier and the fact of an absence are reported here; the ranking itself is not reproduced.
Event dates: the publisher's own announcements of 28 September and 1 October 2026. See the calendar.
Deck names are given in English where this site has used an English name before, and in Japanese where it has not. Nothing on this page reproduces another site's table, ranking or deck list.
Corrections and questions
If something here is wrong, please say so — that is the most useful thing you can do with this page. Comments use GitHub, so you will need an account, and everything posted lives in this site's own repository rather than on a third-party service. No tracking, no ads.