← Duel Masters English

PLAY’S · News · 31 Oct 2026

The card everyone got, and the result nobody posted

The seventh collaboration’s five signed prize cards went into late on 30 October, and one of them is being given to every player free. It is ’s.

Twenty-three minutes before that giveaway post, mid-stream, the official account had asked which of two livers would win and said the winner’s signed card would be the prize. It has posted no result, and it has not said the free card is that prize. Both posts are below; the join between them is not.

Corrected 31 October, within the hour of publishing This page went up headed “Everyone was given the winner’s card, and nobody posted who won”, and its opening said the free card was decided by the duel. Nothing published says that. The account announced a prize rule during the stream and announced a giveaway twenty-three minutes later, and joining the two is exactly the inference this site’s own rules forbid. The body always said so; the headline did not, which is the worse way round.

What the notice says

, . The signed collaboration prize cards of all five livers go into the prize-card exchange.

Exchange opens30 October 2026, 23:00 JST
Closes26 November, at the start of maintenance
Price800 DM points each
Premium version8,000 DM points each
LimitUp to four copies held of each, premium counted separately
Where → → → the tab

Three restrictions are stated in the notice and are easy to miss. A premium ticket cannot be used on a prize card — the 8,000 points is the only route to the premium version. Prize cards cannot be dismantled or crafted. And the notice says a limited-run prize card may be offered again later, so it does not describe this as a last chance.

The five cards

The notice does not say whose card is whose It names the five livers in one sentence and the five cards in a list, and nowhere connects them. The pairing below is read off the announcement artwork, where each card sits under a banner naming one liver. That is an image read, not a text source, and it is marked as one here.

800 DM points, or 8,000 for the premium version. Up to four of each.

800 DM points, or 8,000 for the premium version. Up to four of each.

800 DM points, or 8,000 for the premium version. Up to four of each.

800 DM points, or 8,000 for the premium version. Up to four of each.

800 DM points, or 8,000 for the premium version. Up to four of each.

And one from an earlier collaboration

’s signed , from the third collaboration, is offered again on the same dates at the same prices and the same four-copy limit. The notice calls it .

The duel, and what is not stated

21:02 The stream starts, on ’s own YouTube channel. The official account posts the link.

22:16 — against , and . Both candidate cards are named in the post: and .

22:39 — ’s to every user, one copy, with further copies through the exchange.

Twenty-three minutes separate the question from the prize. The publisher has not posted a result, on the official account or on the news index, and the giveaway post does not mention the duel at all. The two posts are reported here as two posts.

Nor is the free copy documented anywhere but X. covers the exchange and says nothing about a card being given to every player; that is in the 22:39 post and nowhere else, checked 31 October.

What else came out of that night

Between 22:37 and 22:42 the account also posted that the scenarios from the earlier collaborations return while this one runs, through 25 November 23:59. That has no news-index page; it is in the 22:37 post and nowhere else. A collaboration playmat was posted earlier the same afternoon, at 16:00.

Corrected 31 October, within the hour of publishing. This paragraph first grouped the revival with the scenarios and said “neither has a news-index page”. The revival does — it is the second half of , which this page says two sections above. The sentence contradicted the article it was in.

’s signed card is . A card whose name begins the same way appears in her deck builder’s card list, published as an image on 29 October; that list truncates the name, so the match is between an image read and this post, not between two text sources. The record of the two cards announced for her is on the collaboration page; this is one more published card of hers and it is not the disputed one.

The notice came at 23:00

Twelve October notices have had their timestamps read here. Ten carry 5:00 PM — the seven of 19 and 20 October, and the three for EPISODE 38 and the SP Rule Match on the 26th and 29th. Two do not. , November’s official tournaments, is 6:00 PM on 23 October, and it had simply never been timed here until this article was written. And is 11:00 PM, eighteen minutes after the last of the posts that followed the stream. A check of the news index that evening at any time before 23:00 would have found nothing there — the X posts were up from 22:16, but the documented version was not. This site has put a false claim up once by checking four minutes early, which is why the gap is worth stating rather than glossing.

Sources

Where each figure comes from Exchange dates, prices, the four-copy limit, the exchange route and the three restrictions: , timestamped 30 October 2026 11:00 PM, read 31 October.

The duel, the free copy, the returning scenarios and the playmat: the official account , posts of 30 October at 16:00, 21:02, 22:16, 22:37, 22:39, 22:40 and 22:42 JST, times converted from the posts’ own UTC timestamps. The pairing of cards to livers is read off the artwork of the 22:40 post.

Notice timestamps: read from each notice page on 31 October — , , , and — and, for the seven of 19 and 20 October, from this site’s own notes made when those were read.

No artwork is reproduced and no card text is copied. Nothing here reports a winner, because nothing published states one.

Corrections and questions

If something here is wrong, please say so — that is the most useful thing you can do with this page.