← Duel Masters English

PLAY’S · News · 3 Nov 2026

Four nights, four livers, and no notice for any of it

Every evening since 31 October the official account has posted one returning liver: a skin at 19:00 and their collaboration card or cards at 19:30. Four nights, four livers, six cards.

None of it is on the news index, checked through two pages on 3 November.

The four nights

31 Oct · 19:00 skin · 19:30 card

Skin posted with the line ; the artwork reads .

Card: , posted with .

1 Nov · 19:00 skin · 19:30 card

Skin posted with the line ; the artwork reads .

Card: , posted with .

2 Nov · 19:00 skin · 19:30 cards

Skin posted with the line ; the artwork reads .

Cards: · , posted with .

3 Nov · 19:00 skin · 19:30 cards

Skin posted with the line ; the artwork reads .

Cards: · , posted with .

Times are converted from each post’s own UTC timestamp. Two of the four nights carried two cards instead of one, and the change came on 2 November. The card image carries ; the other three were not read closely enough to say.

Which collaboration they are from

The posts do not say. A notice does. , , 22 October 4:00 PM, revives protects and playmats from the sixth collaboration and lists the designs on sale: , , , , , and .

All four livers in this run are in that list, which places them in the sixth collaboration. Five livers are named there and four have appeared so far. That is a count, not a forecast: nothing published says the run continues or who is next.

The notice does not cover these cards also opens an exchange, and the cards in it are and at 600 points, 3,000 for premium. Not one of the six cards posted across these four nights is in that notice. The skins are not in it either. So the accessories of the sixth collaboration are documented and the skins and cards of the same collaboration are not.

What the artwork says about getting them

Every one of the four card posts carries the same banner down the right edge: — obtainable by buying the Collab Set — over a caption reading and the card names. The 3 November image was read at full resolution; on the other three the banner is legible in the post as displayed.

That banner and the Collab Set’s documented contents do not fit together The Collab Set is the seventh collaboration’s, and this site’s calendar records that its one PR card is drawn at random from a pool of five, premium-only, taken from the 20 October notices. These six cards are not those five.

So either the set holds more than the notices describe, or the banner means something looser than membership of that pool. Nothing published says which, and this page is not choosing. It is recorded because the same banner is at the centre of an open question on this site about a card of ’s — that page still ends That is still a contradiction and this page is still not resolving it. What changes is the weight of the banner: it has now appeared on six cards that the documented pool does not contain, so it is not, on its own, evidence that a card is in it.

Engagement

All eight read together at 22:47 JST on 3 November, from the posts’ own accessibility labels rather than the abbreviated figures on screen. Reposts, likes, views.

NightSkin post, 19:00Card post, 19:30
, 31 Oct25 · 293 · 35,59519 · 205 · 33,261
, 1 Nov315 · 1,902 · 58,85094 · 624 · 41,091
, 2 Nov20 · 201 · 29,96418 · 179 · 34,396
, 3 Nov115 · 624 · 28,99651 · 260 · 24,060

’s skin post is the largest of the eight on every figure: 315 reposts against 115, 25 and 20 on the other three nights. Age does not explain the ordering — the 1 November night is larger than the 31 October one on all six figures, despite being a day younger. This site does not know why and is not guessing; the numbers are here because they are what the posts show.

Corrected 3 November, within the hour of publishing This table first gave ’s skin post as 20 reposts, 276 likes and 3.0 views, and said all eight were read between 22:45 and 22:55 that night. That row was read on 1 November and carried over, so the table mixed two readings two days apart while claiming one. All eight have now been re-read together at 22:47 on 3 November, from the accessibility labels, which also gives exact view counts instead of the rounded figures the page first carried.
Corrected 3 November, in a later pass The sentence under the table read “the oldest night has fewer views than the newest on its skin post and more on its card post”. The first half of that was wrong. The oldest night has more views than the newest on both posts, not fewer — 35,595 against 28,996 on the skin post, and 33,261 against 24,060 on the card post. The error was in the sentence and not in the table, and it survived the correction above because that pass fixed the figures without recomputing the sentence that reads off them. The point it was supporting still holds, on different figures: the 1 November night outranks the 31 October one on all six.

Sources

Where each figure comes from The eight posts: the official account , 31 October to 3 November, at 19:00 and 19:30 each day, times converted from the posts’ own UTC timestamps. Skin captions, card names and the lines under them are from the post text. The lines and the banner are image reads — one image at full resolution, the rest legible as displayed.

The sixth-collaboration placement, the accessory prices and the exchange contents: , timestamped 22 October 2026 4:00 PM, read 3 November. No news-index page exists for any of these eight posts, checked across two pages of the index on 3 November. Added later on 3 November, on a firmer basis: the newest entry on the index is 30 October — news/16475, the signed-card exchange — and the entries run in date order from there. Nothing has been added to the index since, so no post from any of these four nights could be on it. The index was re-read from the page source at 23:14 JST, not from the rendered page.

No artwork is reproduced and no card text is copied.

Corrections and questions

If something here is wrong, please say so — that is the most useful thing you can do with this page.