← Duel Masters English

PLAY'S · Community · 14 Sep 2026

What players are saying about set 37 so far

A day after the first reveals, the reaction has three clear strands: a card that came out stronger than its paper version, a rarity decision people are annoyed about, and paper players recognising a deck they already know.

Nine posts That is how many this is based on, read in one pass. X search does not return enough to measure proportions with, so nothing below is a claim about what most players think. Posts are paraphrased and anonymised; engagement figures are given where a view was widely shared.

The buff went down well

On Balga Raiza Straightforward delight that the creature has Speed Attacker on its own, rather than only while the hand-size condition is met. One post reads as someone checking twice that they had understood it correctly.

That is a real change rather than an impression. In the paper original the Speed Attacker came packaged with the conditional keyword; here it is unconditional, and the conditional ability instead hands Speed Attacker to everything else you control.

It is a clean example of something this site has written about in the abstract: card text gets rewritten in both directions, so a card's paper reputation tells you very little. Here it was rewritten upwards, and the people who knew the paper card noticed within the hour.

The complaint is about rarity, not power

On the field card · roughly 200 likes Annoyance that a card decks will want four copies of has been printed at Super Rare. The objection is not that it is too strong — it is that four copies of the highest rarity is an expensive way to enter a deck.

This is the sharpest reaction in the sample, and it is a cost argument rather than a balance one. For scale, the decks currently at the top of the format run between 42,000 and 52,700 DMP to build. A four-of Super Rare is a meaningful share of that before the rest of the deck exists.

Paper players recognise the archetype

Two posts One notes that a post from 2018 — written when the deck was new in paper — has started collecting likes again purely because the card is arriving here. Another, a paper player, is considering streaming the deck in PLAY'S and taking instructions from viewers, on the grounds that they know the archetype but not the digital game.

That second one is the interesting direction. Most crossover traffic gets discussed the other way round — digital players curious about paper. This is someone with eight years of paper experience treating PLAY'S as the thing they need help with.

And the speculation has already started

Combo hunting, within a day One post works through whether a card that targets elements can target the new field, and what that would mean in sequence with the ninety-nine cost spell. Another three of the nine posts are links to video breakdowns of the new cards.

Three of nine posts being published video analysis, a day after reveal, is worth noting on its own. The Japanese coverage layer around this game moves fast — there is a lot of it — and a set is picked apart well before it is playable.

What is not in the sample

Nobody in these nine posts is worried about the format. The complaints are about price and the excitement is about power — which is a different mood from three weeks ago. Compared with the reaction to the collaboration

When the collaboration landed at the end of August, the loudest posts were from players being beaten by the existing metagame. Here, with no cards playable yet, the mood is anticipation. Those are not comparable situations, and the contrast may say more about timing than about sentiment.

Ask again after release. Reactions to an unreleased set are reactions to card text; reactions to a released one are reactions to losing.

Sources

Corrections and questions

If something here is wrong, please say so — that is the most useful thing you can do with this page. Comments use GitHub, so you will need an account, and everything posted lives in this site's own repository rather than on a third-party service. No tracking, no ads.